中新网?银川5月10日电 (记者 ??杨?迪)5月10日
，尤尼克斯YONEX“王者之志寻梦之旅”中国站走进宁夏银川
。林丹、?彼得?·盖德、陶?菲克·希达亚特、李?龙大、卡罗琳娜?·马林·马丁等羽坛名将齐聚一堂
，为观众送上一场羽毛球视觉?盛宴
，配合推广羽毛球运动
。

本次活动设置“翎跃山海对抗赛”“王者演出赛”“场外竞技·王者嘉年华?”三大焦点赛事版块
。由双圈满贯林丹、韩国双打名将李龙大领队的墨影战队
，与印尼羽球天王陶菲克·希达亚特、丹麦羽球传奇彼得·盖德、西班牙羽球女王?卡罗琳娜·马林·马丁率领的鎏金战队睁开对决???
。羽坛?名将在赛场上的精彩体现
，引得现场阵阵欢呼
。

同时
，?活动还在场外设置“王者嘉年华”版块
，通过意见意义竞技、互动体验等多元活动
，让民众感受羽毛球运动的魅力
。

值得注重的是
，活动现场
，YONEX向银川阅海小学?捐赠此次“王者之志寻梦之旅?”活动的所有售票收益
，用?于推动外地青少年羽毛球运动生长
，并允许自今年起每年向天下规模内筛选的公益机构及学?校
，捐赠相当于“王者之5志”天下赛参赛人数十倍价值的运动物资
，一连助力?中国羽毛球事业生长
。

据介?绍
，YONEX“王者之志”天下羽毛球巡回赛十年来已跨越34座都会
，为12万名羽毛球喜欢者搭建起专业且开放的竞技平台
，成为推动羽毛球文化生长的主要实力
。(完)

• 凭证他的竞选语言
  ，对中国出口到美国的商品加征60%以上的关税
  ，甚至有的商品不扫除还要更多一些
• 　　海通證券有18家
  ，國泰君安、國金證券各有16家
  ，招商證券(14.950, -0.10, -0.66%)、國投證券各有14家
  ，東方證券(8.450, -0.13, -1.52%)承銷保薦有12家、廣發證券(11.920, -0.09, -0.75%)、國信證券、申萬宏源證券承銷保薦、東興證券(8.250, -0.15, -1.79%)、長江證券(4.960, -0.08, -1.59%)承銷保薦、東吳證券(6.020, -0.11, -1.79%)各有8家
  ，浙商證券(10.970, -0.13, -1.17%)有7家
  ，開源證券有6家
• 别的
  ，沙漏会S36特邀专家对加大财务政策逆周期调理力度举行解说
  ，先容了包括超恒久特殊国债、新增地方政府专项债务、财务津贴、贴息以及税收优惠等政策工具
  ，强调了起劲财务政策关于稳固经济增添、增进就业、控制通胀和稳固金融市场的主要性
  。
• 由于华凯易佰是以出口为主导营业的
• SAN FRANCISCO — Google and Facebook have been taking steps to curb the number of false news articles propagated across their sites. On Wednesday, the Silicon Valley companies showed that they were still in the early stages of their battle to limit misinformation online. In a blog post, Google said it had permanently banned nearly 200 publishers from its AdSense advertising network near the end of last year, after putting into effect a policy in November to choke off websites that try to deceive users from its online ad service. On the same day, Facebook introduced changes to its Trending Topics feature — a part of the social network that some have blamed for spreading false information — to better promote reliable news articles. Yet taken together, the efforts showed how the fight against fake news remains a work in progress. Google’s bans were a drop in the bucket compared with the almost two million publishers that use AdSense. Facebook’s new measures were part of a continuing series of small experiments by the company to find out what worked best in displaying news to its users. “We genuinely asked Google and Facebook for ‘moonshots,’” said Jason Kint, the chief executive of Digital Content Next, an online publishing industry group. “We appreciate the work, but based on the numbers, that’s hardly even running in place. ” Google and Facebook have been in something of a situation in recent months when it comes to fake news. Both companies have been grappling with a widespread backlash over how their sites may have spread rumors on a vast scale, and how little responsibility they take for any of the content that appears on their platforms. The issue came to a head after the American presidential election, when commentators accused Facebook in particular of swaying voters to President Trump through misleading and untrue news articles. In response, both companies have tried various measures to limit fake news. Google in November said it would ban sites that spread misinformation from AdSense as a way to impair how such sites make money. That same month, Facebook updated some of its policy language, which already said it would not display ads on sites that show misleading or illegal content, to include fake news sites. Facebook has since introduced other changes, including consulting news organizations like The Associated Press and ABC News about the accuracy of articles that users report as being false. Google’s blog post on Wednesday was the first time the company explained the results of its moves against publishers that spread misinformation. The search giant said it reviewed 550 sites “suspected of misrepresenting content to users, including impersonating news organizations” in November and December. It took action against 340 of those sites and kicked nearly 200 publishers off its network permanently. Google was careful not to say that these were fake news sites, only sites that deceive users by misrepresenting themselves or their content. This month, Media Matters noted that Google changed the language of its advertising policy, removing the words “fake news. ” Google said the language change noted by Media Matters involved examples that help explain its policy but were not changes to the actual policy. Google declined to identify the sites or publishers it banned. Before taking steps to thwart fake news publishers, Google had an existing policy that outlawed publishers of “misrepresentative content,” such as websites peddling schemes or counterfeit goods. It expanded this policy to include sites impersonating news organizations. Google was pulled into the fake news debate when Mediaite reported that, in the days after the election, the top result on a Google search for “final election vote count 2016” was a link to an article that incorrectly stated that Mr. Trump, who won the Electoral College, was ahead of his Democratic challenger, Hillary Clinton, in the popular vote. Google said that its search algorithms fell short but that the company would continue to work to improve its results. The AdSense system is a major revenue driver for independent web publishers who rely on the network to deliver display advertising on their sites. The publishers are paid when a reader views or clicks on those ads, with a portion of the proceeds going to Google. AdSense is one of the largest advertising networks on the web with nearly two million publishers using the system. Facebook did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the number of sites it has banned since November. Trending Topics is a feature on the social network that tells people what popular topics are being discussed on the site. Apart from more transparency around headlines, the changes to the feature on Wednesday included identifying popular topics through the number of publishers posting articles on Facebook about a piece of news, rather than engagement around a single article. “Today’s update may also help prevent hoaxes and fake news from appearing in Trending because the updated system identifies groups of articles shared on Facebook instead of relying solely on mentions of a topic,” the company said in a blog post. Still, industry watchers remain skeptical about the efficacy of these moves. “Nothing drives clicks better than when the headline is exactly what people want to hear or believe,” Ian Schafer, the chief executive and founder of Deep Focus, a digital advertising agency, referring specifically to Google. Mr. Schafer said that without significant changes to the economics and technology of online ads, banning individual sites would not produce change in the long run.