北京时间5月12日，塞普-斯塔卡（Sepp Straka）在第16?洞保帕取得领先，最终打出68杆，低于标准杆2杆，在费城板球俱乐部举行的储亿锦标赛中战胜肖恩-劳瑞（Shane Lowry），赢得本赛?季第二场胜利。

"这意义重大，是我职业生涯最主要的胜利，"斯塔卡说。

当劳瑞在16号洞，212码三杆洞，开球失?误未能上?果岭时，斯塔卡将球?打到距洞约30英尺处。劳瑞从浓密长草中切球后，未能推进6英尺保帕推，落到一杆之后。

劳瑞随后在17号洞长距离四杆洞错失22英?尺追平领先者的小鸟推，又在18号洞，?514码四杆洞开球失误，最终以三推柏忌竣事角逐。

这?场主要的后九洞对决以略显平庸的方法收。核顾卡没有压力地两推保帕，成为罗里-麦克?罗伊（三场胜利）之外，美巡赛本赛季又一个多冠王。这位曾代表佐治亚大学参?加大学联赛的奥地利选手，今年1月赢得了美国运通锦标赛，职业生涯已获四场胜利。

斯塔卡的四轮效果为264杆（63-67-66-68），低于标准?杆16杆。?

劳瑞再次与储亿锦标赛冠军失之交臂。他上一次在美巡赛夺冠照旧2019年英国果真赛。2022年他曾赢得欧巡赛BMW欧洲锦标赛。劳瑞本轮打出70杆，平标准杆，与末轮发?起攻击的贾斯汀?-托马斯（67杆）并?列第二名，效果为266杆，低于标准杆14杆。

帕特里克-坎特利（65杆）、雅各布-布里奇曼（Jacob Bridgeman，65杆）和汤米-弗利特伍德（65杆）以268杆，低于标准杆1?2杆的效果并列第四位。

卫冕冠军麦克罗?伊（其四场胜利均来自通例举行地恐慌山谷俱?乐部）始终未能进入状态，本轮?打出68杆，低于标?准杆2杆，以270杆?，低于标准杆10杆并列第七。

安德鲁-诺?瓦克（Andrew Novak）上月与本-格里芬（Ben Griffin）同伴赢得苏黎世新奥尔良精英赛，周日打出当日最低的64杆（-6），最终并列第17名。

索希斯-斯加拉（Sahith Theegala）?因颈部伤势在决赛轮开?始前退赛。

（小风）

• Even if she’s a little off base here, Angela is showing the importance of not being complacent in the face of tyranny, and we think that’s awesome. Stay strong, Angela. You’ll get through this."
• WASHINGTON — President Trump is poised in the coming days to announce his plans to dismantle the centerpiece of President Barack Obama’s climate change legacy, while also gutting several smaller but significant policies aimed at curbing global warming. The moves are intended to send an unmistakable signal to the nation and the world that Mr. Trump intends to follow through on his campaign vows to rip apart every element of what the president has called Mr. Obama’s “stupid” policies to address climate change. The timing and exact form of the announcement remain unsettled, however. The executive actions will follow the White House’s release last week of a proposed budget that would eliminate climate change research and prevention programs across the federal government and slash the Environmental Protection Agency’s budget by 31 percent, more than any other agency. Mr. Trump also announced last week that he had ordered Scott Pruitt, the E. P. A. administrator, to revise the agency’s stringent standards on tailpipe pollution from vehicles, another of Mr. Obama’s key climate change policies. While the White House is not expected to explicitly say the United States is withdrawing from the 2015 Paris Agreement on climate change, and people familiar with the White House deliberations say Mr. Trump has not decided whether to do so, the policy reversals would make it virtually impossible to meet the emissions reduction goals set by the Obama administration under the international agreement. In an announcement that could come as soon as Thursday or as late as next month, according to people familiar with the White House’s planning, Mr. Trump will order Mr. Pruitt to withdraw and rewrite a set of regulations known as the Clean Power Plan, according to a draft document obtained by The New York Times. The Obama rule was devised to shut down hundreds of heavily polluting power plants and freeze construction of new coal plants, while replacing them with vast wind and solar farms. The draft also lays out options for legally blocking or weakening about a additional executive orders and policies on climate change. At a rally on Monday in the state of Kentucky, Mr. Trump told a cheering audience that he is preparing an executive action that would “save our wonderful coal miners from continuing to be put out of work. ” Experts in environmental law say it will not be possible for Mr. Trump to quickly or simply roll back the most substantive elements of Mr. Obama’s climate change regulations, noting that the process presents a steep legal challenge that could take many years and is likely to end up before the Supreme Court. Economists are skeptical that a rollback of the rules would restore lost coal jobs because the demand for coal has been steadily shrinking for years. Scientists and climate policy advocates around the world say they are watching the administration’s global warming actions and statements with deep worry. Many reacted with deep concern to Mr. Pruitt’s remarks this month that he did not believe carbon dioxide was a primary driver of climate change, a statement at odds with the global scientific consensus. They also noted the remarks last week by Mick Mulvaney, the director of the White House Office of Management and Budget, in justifying Mr. Trump’s proposed cuts to climate change research programs. “As to climate change, I think the president was fairly straightforward: We’re not spending money on that anymore,” Mr. Mulvaney said at a White House briefing. “The message they are sending to the rest of the world is that they don’t believe climate change is serious. It’s shocking to see such a degree of ignorance from the United States,” said Mario J. Molina, a Nobel scientist from Mexico who advises nations on climate change policy. The policy reversals also signal that Mr. Trump has no intention of following through on Mr. Obama’s formal pledges under the Paris accord, under which nearly every country in the world submitted plans detailing actions to limit global warming over the coming decade. Under the accord as it stands, the United States has pledged to reduce its greenhouse pollution about 26 percent from 2005 levels by 2025. That can be achieved only if the United States not only implements the Clean Power Plan and rules, but also tightens them or adds more policies in future years. “The message clearly is, ‘We won’t do what the United States has promised to do,’” Mr. Molina said. In addition to directing Mr. Pruitt to withdraw the Clean Power Plan, the draft order instructs Attorney General Jeff Sessions to request that a federal court halt consideration of a lawsuit against the regulation. The case was argued before the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in September, and the court is expected to release a decision in the coming months on whether to uphold or strike down the rule. According to the draft, Mr. Trump is also expected to announce that he will lift a moratorium on new coal mining leases on public lands that had been announced last year by the Obama administration. He is also expected to order White House economists to revisit an budgeting metric known as the social cost of carbon. Economists and policy makers used the metric to place a dollar cost on the economic impact of carbon dioxide pollution: about $36 per ton. That measure formed the Obama administration’s economic justification for issuing climate change regulations that would harm some industries, such as coal mining, noting that those costs would be outweighed by the economic benefits of preventing billions of tons of pollution. Eliminating or lowering the social cost of carbon could provide the Trump administration the economic justification for putting forth regulations. The draft order would also rescind an executive order by Mr. Obama that all federal agencies take climate change into account when considering any form of environmental permitting. Unlike the rollback of the power plant and vehicle regulations, which could take years and will be subject to legal challenges, Mr. Trump can make the changes to the coal mining ban and undo Mr. Obama’s executive orders with the stroke of a pen. White House staff members and energy lobbyists who work closely with them say they have been expecting Mr. Trump to make the climate change announcements for weeks, ever since Mr. Pruitt was confirmed to head the E. P. A. on Feb. 17, but the announcement has been repeatedly rescheduled. The delays of the announcement have largely been a result of disorganization and a chaotic policy and planning process, said people familiar with that process who asked to speak anonymously to avoid angering Mr. Trump. One reason for the confusion, these people said, is internal disputes about the challenging legal process required to dismantle the Clean Power Plan. While Mr. Trump may announce with great fanfare his intent to roll back the regulations, the legal steps required to fulfill that announcement are lengthy and the outcome uncertain. “Trump’s announcements have zero impact,” said Richard J. Lazarus, a professor of environmental law at Harvard. “They don’t change existing law at all. ” Much of that task will now fall to Mr. Pruitt. “To undo the rule, the E. P. A. will now have to follow the same procedure that was followed to put the regulations in place,” said Mr. Lazarus, pointing to a multiyear process of proposing draft rules, gathering public comment and forming a legal defense against an expected barrage of lawsuits almost certain to end up before the Supreme Court.
• 《步伐》还明确了标签、说明书不得含有的9种情形，增添了不起使用“入口奶源”“源自外洋牧场”“生态牧场”“入口质料”“原生态奶源”“无污染奶源”等模糊信息
  ；不得使用“人乳化”“母乳化”或者近似术语表述
  ；不得使用其他不切合执法、规则、规章和食物清静国家标准划定的内容，并枚举了昭示或体现具有保健作用的情形等。
• 　　其中，济南有店今年中秋节的销量同比去年下降一半，且五粮液(109.450, -1.45, -1.31%)、茅台等高端白酒受攻击最大，销量下滑约60%
• Infowars.com reports: