下载恒发app官网

中新?网北京5月16日电(记者 王诗尧)“相亲相到了宋仲基！”克日
，有网友在社交网站上?发帖称
，有牙婆为其先容相亲工具
，不料发来的照片竟是韩国明星宋仲基的照片
，但先容人声称就是“自己”。

谈论区里不但多名网友都曾遇过类似情形
，更引来台州网警留言提醒：“未?经明星赞成使用其照片冒充他人
，可能组成肖像权侵权
，若涉及营利或诓骗
，执法责任更重?。”

? 相亲吗？我“明星脸”

这年头
，“明星”最先进军相亲市场了吗？

一名网友发帖称
，牙婆为其先容相亲工具
，发来的基本信息是：1996年台州籍男生
，身高180
，学历是整日制本科？吹秸饫镆磺谢拐
，不料询问长相时
，对方发来的照片竟是一张明星的帅照。

该网友认出照片里的人是韩国男星宋仲基
，于是委婉询问是否为自己时
，却获得对方肯定的谜底。网友将这则爆笑相亲故事分享出来后
，意外获得各人的热烈反响
，没想到民间随处是“明星”
，这种冒用“明星照”或“网红照”相亲的事情还真不少。

有人在相亲机构遇到“易烊千玺”；有?人不识“王一博”
，已全心动畅想未来；更有人发来“狄龙”的是非老照片
，妄想使用已往的明星照片降低被识破的概率。

无论是自己或中心人
，使用“明星照”的目的大致分为有意或无意：有意者可能是出于“诈骗”等利益目的
，或是使用“明星”的帅照、美图加持
，意图增添对方的好感度等。这些人在?被识破后通常毫?无羞愧之意
，更有人声称自己就是“明星脸”
，仙颜水平平分秋色。

也有一些人是“误用”明星图片
，好比相亲者使用的社交网站头像被误认是自己
，或经由中心人误传导致误会爆发等。

有网友总结
，这时间追星的利益就凸显出来了
，无论哪个国家的明星都能一眼认出
，防骗能力大增！

状师：第三方做中心人或需担责

婚恋市场中冒用明星照片行为有哪些危害？北京市京都状师事务所状师常莎告诉中新网记者
，?在相亲或网恋历程中
，若是一方使用明星的照片并声称是自己
，可能需要肩负民事侵权责任以致刑事责任。

凭证《民法典》划定
，自然人享有肖像权
，未经自己赞成?
，不得制作、使用、果真其肖像。网恋时未经允许使用明星的照片
，可能会侵占该名人的肖像权。别的
，若是一方居心使用明星照片误导另?一方进入恋爱关系
，并在此过程中获取了对方的财物或其他利益
，还可能组成诓骗罪
，肩负刑事责任。

常莎特殊指出
，当?涉及到第三方作为中心先容人时
，无论是无利益关联的通俗人照旧专业的婚介所或婚恋网站
，可能都需肩负一定的责任。无利益关联的通俗人在先容朋侪熟悉时
，居心使?用明星照片误导对方
，若后续爆发经济损失或其他形式的危险
，可能?需要肩负响应的民事赔偿责任。

别的
，婚介效劳机构作为专业第三方需遵守更为严酷的划定
，负有信息核实义务。若是婚介机构未推行尽职视察义务
，?反而冒用明星照片吸引会员
，导致消耗者遭受损失
，将受到民事赔偿及行政处分。

小心！AI换脸、虚伪人设防不堪防

据常莎先容
，婚恋市场中因居心编造虚伪人设或身份信息而引发的纠纷司空见惯。如2024年央视“3·15”晚会曝光
，珍爱网、世纪佳缘?等婚介平台在提供婚恋居间效劳中居心捏造切合客户心意的“?虚拟人”形象
，组成《反不正当竞争法》所榨取的虚伪宣传行为。

不但云云
，AI语音、换脸等手艺泛起后
，使得一些人打起了冒充明星从事婚恋诈骗的主意。此前就有诈骗?团伙在短视频平台上宣布冒充“靳东”等?明星或名人的视频或音频
，吸引中晚年妇女
，骗取对方信任。随后再以该明星或名人的身份与被害人开展网聊、网恋
，诱导被害人与“明星”建设情绪联系
，最后以投资、公益?、应援、网购、恋爱等种种理由索要钱款
，骗取多名被害人的钱财。

 2024年2月
，上海市静安区人民法院开庭审理冒充演员“靳东”诈骗案。上海市静安区人民法院供图

2025年两会时代
，天下政协委员靳东回应了AI换脸导致的诈骗问题。他说：“一些喜欢我影视剧的观众
，被AI换脸视频骗得很?惨
，这个性子很是卑劣。希望能建设更好的规则。”

常莎提醒
，在婚恋?市场中
，应审慎看待过于完善的形象展示
，对看似?完善无缺的工具要坚持小心
，特殊是当对方不肯视频通话或者晤面时更应小心。别的
，还可使用多渠道验证对方身份信息
，通过社交网络平台查找对?方是否保存真实的账号
，审查是否有配合挚友等要领来辅助?判断。

最后
，应增强自我；ひ馐
，不要容易透露身份证号、银行卡号等小我私家信息
，若发明眉目应实时报警并留存对方身份信息、谈天纪录等证据质料
，以尽快挽回损失、阻止损害扩大。(完)

软件APP

• 转自：金十数据　　堪萨斯城联储主席施密德体现
  ，在支持任何最先降息的决议之前
  ，他希望看到更多经济数据
• 专题：美联储宣布降息50个基点！开启降息周期　　转自：金十数据　　美联储周四破晓接纳了重大行动
  ，举行了四年来首次降息
• WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court nomination of Judge Neil M. Gorsuch is now going to the Senate floor. The Senate minority leader, Chuck Schumer of New York, has pledged to lead Democrats in a filibuster of the nomination. If he does, the majority leader, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, has vowed to change Senate rules to clear the way for Judge Gorsuch. The potential showdown has raised interest in the peculiar Senate filibuster rule. What is a filibuster? A filibuster is an effort by a minority of lawmakers to delay or block the Senate from voting on a bill or a confirmation. By exploiting the chamber’s rules for full debate on an issue, the minority can indefinitely obstruct something that has majority support. According to the Senate Historical Office, the term traces back to a Dutch word meaning “pirate. ” How does it work? The Senate generally operates by unanimous consent. If any senators refuse to consent to holding an vote on Judge Gorsuch’s nomination, the Senate has to decide whether to overrule them. It would do so by holding a “cloture” vote on whether to end debate and proceed to a final vote. It takes 60 votes to invoke cloture, so 41 senators can indefinitely block a confirmation by refusing to vote for cloture. What is the ‘nuclear option’? This is what Mr. McConnell has threatened if Democrats muster enough votes to filibuster Judge Gorsuch. By a simple majority, Republicans would change the Senate’s rules to abolish the ability of a minority to filibuster Supreme Court confirmation votes. The term was apparently coined by Senate Republicans around 2003, when they threatened to use the tactic to defeat Democrats who were blocking votes on some of President George W. Bush’s appeals court nominees. It was meant to evoke horror, because the power play would undermine the Senate’s purported character as a collegial and body, making it more like the House of Representatives. Would that be unprecedented? No. It would be an expansion of a precedent set by Democrats in 2013, when they had a Senate majority and used the nuclear option to eliminate some other types of filibusters. Both parties have been engaged in a escalation of partisan warfare over judgeships for a generation, from the Senate’s defeat of President Ronald Reagan’s nomination of Judge Robert Bork to the Supreme Court in 1987 through its refusal to take up President Barack Obama’s nomination of Judge Merrick B. Garland last year. As part of that story, back in 2013, Senate Republicans were obstructing Mr. Obama’s nominees to executive branch positions and judgeships. Under Harry Reid of Nevada, the majority leader, Democrats used a simple majority vote to change the rules, abolishing the need to muster 60 votes to proceed to an vote on such nominations. But they left the filibuster rule intact for Supreme Court nominations and for legislation. Notably, Senate Republicans are not threatening to eliminate the ability of 41 senators to block new laws, although adherents of Senate tradition fear that each erosion of the rule makes that prospect more likely. Are filibusters part of the Constitution? No, they are only an artifact of Senate rules. Originally, the chamber had a tradition that members could stay on the floor and talk as long as they wanted. But in 1917, amid acrimonious arguments over whether the United States should take part in World War I, it created the cloture rule to provide a mechanism for a supermajority of 67 senators to cut off debate and proceed to a final vote. In 1975, the Senate reduced the supermajority requirement to 60 votes. Do senators have to keep talking in order to filibuster? No. That’s called a talking filibuster, and it is the image created by the 1939 Frank Capra movie “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington,” in which an idealistic senator played by Jimmy Stewart holds the floor to prevent a corrupt bill until he collapses. Filibusters took on less saintly overtones during the civil rights era, when Southern Democrats used them to block civil rights legislation, including an bill. The record for the longest such filibuster speech is held by Senator Strom Thurmond of South Carolina, who was then a Democrat but later became a Republican. He held the floor for 24 hours and 18 minutes to delay and protest the enactment of the Civil Rights Act of 1957, the first voting rights bill to become law since the War Reconstruction era. Talking filibusters have essentially been obsolete since the early 1970s, when the Senate changed its rules to permit more than one bill or matter to be pending on the floor simultaneously. That has permitted the Senate to move on to other business while theoretical “debate” on the blocked item continues indefinitely, although occasionally a senator holds a lengthy talking filibuster anyway to attract attention to an issue.
• ”他指的是美国经济增添放缓的远景
• “鉴于差别类型、行业、企业的建会模式、步队结构、效劳内容保存差别
  ，不可简朴化处置惩罚。

点评装置

• 　　“机关食堂仍保存取餐铺张情形
  ，提醒标记没有上墙……”问题就地发明
  ，就地反响
  ，要求立马整改落实。
• Hillary won’t push to bring back Glass-Steagall. Doing so would dismantle her husband’s legacy and that of the men he and she appointed to public office. Whatever cosmetic alterations may be in store, count on that act remaining an artifact of the past, since its resurrection would dismay the bankers who, over the past three decades, made the Clintons what they are.
• 值此“9·24”行情满月之际
  ，自动权益基金在市场转暖历程中的调仓动向值得一观
• 　　湖南是农业大省
  ，杂交水稻从这里的实验田走向天下；湖南是制造业大省
  ，在工程机械领域举足轻重；同时
  ，以“广电湘军”“出书湘军”为代表的文化工业恒久引领风流。
• 要鼎力大举宣传中华民族的历史
  ，鼎力大举宣传中华民族配合体理论
  ，鼎力大举宣传新时代党的民族事情取得的历史性成绩
  ，鼎力大举宣传中华民族同天下各国人民携手构建人类运气配合体的优美愿景。

点评官方版

　　继今年第一季度的下跌之后
，苹果（AAPL.US）在第二季度恢复到5.6%的同比增添率在三季度非货规模居前的20家基金公司中
，4家基金公司规模增量突破千亿元
，其中“拳头”宽基产品孝顺了绝大大都的规模增量股價的大幅波動不僅增添了投資難度
，也增添了投資風險