? 

大乐透8.8亿大派奖正在火热进?行中，在25041和2?5042期大乐透开奖中，后?区开出重号05和11，后区11更是直落3期！许多彩民好奇，大乐透历届派奖时代奖号中，哪?些号码泛起概率最大呢？来看看哪个号码热度最高！

笔者整理了自2014年以来，近?11年大乐透派奖时代出的奖号，从彩民体贴的龙头、凤尾和后区出发，为?彩民选号攻击派奖期大奖提供灵感。首先是龙头方面，近11年派奖期?最热龙头为02，02泛起过36次遥遥领先，其次是01，一共泛起过30次。然后是凤尾方面，凤尾35泛起过33次，紧随厥后的是凤尾34。?

后区方面，后区第一码当中，0?3和05现身32次，并列??频率最高。后区第二码?中，09和11划分现身3?0次，同样并列开出频率最多。通过派奖时代后区两码的现身次数来看，某一个奇码频发征象较?多。由此可见，今年派奖期7次开奖，后区1?1一连现身3?次就不希奇了。

提到大乐透派奖期后区各奖号现身频率，笔者统计了近11年的数据。从表格中可以看?出，05码成派奖?时代最受接待的后区号码。其次就是04码、07码、09码和10码，可见奇数码照旧略胜一筹。值得注重的是，后区泛起次数排名第三的07码在今年派奖时代还未现身，后期是否会频仍开出呢，让我们拭目以待。

大乐透派奖时代前区最热奖号是什么？通过表格我们可以看出，奖号20泛起次?数最多，妥妥的派奖期“骄子”！另外则依次是02码、11码、19码、15码。凭证近11年大乐透派奖时代现身次数，可以从选出最热的一注5+2，即“02、11、?15、19、20+04、05”，值得参考。

需要提醒列位彩民的是，彩票开奖属于随机事务，这些数字纪律只是为我们选号时提供灵感。列位彩民在加入大乐透派奖活动的同时，现实投注?时需多多坚持理性，实事求是。

（料如是）

• 这一数字报17.3万人
• The words Extraordinary Claims needs to be banished when talking Extraterrestrials page: 1 link I was reading an article that talked about Extraterrestrials the other day and of course at the end of the article the tired line about Extraordinary measures....blah, blah, blah came out towards the end of the article. This needs to stop when talking about Extraterrestrials. It may have been an extraordinary claim 60 years ago but it's not today. With the scientific evidence we have today, many people including one of the top Scientist of our time has reached the conclusion that Extraterrestrials exist based on the evidence. Hawking said,"Aliens almost certainly exist." These are conclusions reached based on the evidence not extraordinary claims. The article was on a possible signal that could be of Extraterrestrial origin. This signal matches a prediction made in 2012 and it's just science. This is what was said at the end of the article and it's this type of thinking that needs to stop. With things like water found on other planets, exoplanets in habitable zones, extremophiles in places we thought life couldn't exist, building blocks of life found on comets and more, saying Extraterrestrials exist isn't an extraordinary claim but a possible explanation based on the evidence. Here's what was said. “The one in 10,000 objects with unusual spectra seen by Borra and Trottier are certainly worthy of additional study,” the team said in a statement. “However, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. “It is too early to unequivocally attribute these purported signals to the activities of extraterrestrial civilizations. Internationally agreed-upon protocols for searches for evidence of advanced life beyond Earth (SETI) require candidates to be confirmed by independent groups using their own telescopes, and for all natural explanations to be exhausted before invoking extraterrestrial agents as an explanation. www.independent.co.uk... First, the Scientist who are behind this study never said UNEQUIVOCALLY. This is an old tactic that's used by some people on this board from time to time. They can't debate the evidence presented so they try to make it seem as you made a blanket sstatement. The Scientist say "PROBABLY" right there on the updated comments on their published paper. Here's what they said: But they make clear that further work will need to be done to confirm or deny that hypothesis. That will need to be done by watching for the same signals on different equipment so that all other explanations can be discarded. Again, NOBODY SAID UNEQUIVOCALLY. I hate it when people do that. This is why I always ask people to quote me where I said this or that because when people can't debate the evidence they try to debate against things that were never said. They also said this: ALL natural explanations need to be exhausted BEFORE Extraterrestrials are invoked as a possible explanation. WHAT!!! That makes no sense. This standard would make it almost impossible to find an Extraterrestrial signal. In most cases ALL natural explanations will never be exhausted so we will have to talk about these things in terms of probability and what's most likely and least likely at least at first. Look, it's easy to cherry pick after the fact. Like I said, an earlier study about the search for Extraterrestrials PREDICTED that we would see these signals and that would be evidence to support the hypothesis. That's just Science. If you look at the sentence, it says BEFORE you can even invoke Extraterrestrials as a possible explanation. Again, that's absurd. Extraterrestrial existence needs to be looked at as a possible explanation based on the observed evidence not an extraordinary claim. edit on 26-10-2016 by neoholographic because: (no reason given)
• 中国人民银行钱币政策司司长邹澜在上星期三（9月20日）的新闻宣布会上体现，预计凌驾九成切合条件的乞贷人可在第一时间充分享受政策盈利，其他乞贷人的存量房贷利率也将在10月尾前完成调解。
• 　　数据显示，反向来华旅游的法国游客，主要为80后、90后、70后和10后，划分占比28%、20%、16%和14%
• 　　这位家长之以是阻挡孩子被校长推荐，那是由于一旦被校长推荐加入北大的自主招生考试之后，就相当于提前锁定了高考自愿：在高考中只能填报北京大学。